Archive for the ‘Land’ Category
A Vallepietra there was a civic use quite rare: the inhabitants used to round up their income by building bark baskets that were then sold in Rome. They, therefore the use of street barking. More widespread in southern Italy was rather that of “level”, ie in terms of agricultural use of land by the so-called libel, or contract. With the passage of time and changing production methods in agriculture this mode of use of common public goods has gradually lost its importance, even for the deep failures and chaos organization he created.
The very special attitude of the present case the disorder in 1927 directed the legislature to determine that all civic uses existing at that time should have been claimed and settled by giving the possibility of freeing the subject and, therefore, to turn over the land of Municipal owned property or property encumbered by civic use in full freehold and exclusive setting up a special magistrate said Commissioner to civic uses, with the primary, but not limited to liquidate such uses (when ruling on private land) and with the power adjust administrative uses not cleared (interesting communal lands, fractional or other entities, or on surfaces water).
In 1927 the legislature intended to distinguish the various civic uses into two main categories: collective ownership of land (land civic) and private land ownership but on which rests a civic right to use in the community. The owners of the land use appeal with civic can remove this constraint by redressing the community in cash (liquidation) or ground (external). In the latter case is a bounded portion of the fund becomes collective property (land house) where the community exercises its right to civic use. For example, in the town of Ardea entire estate, called “Banditella” was a real house and land was specifically intended to be leased annually by banditura auction (hence the name) and the proceeds went to benefit the community Ardea.
The collective ownership of land (land house) conveniently used for agriculture are often allocated in units leasing for individual members of the community right-holder, in this case, the legislature provided that, with special procedures, could alienate and redeem ( legitimize and / or postage) units, and became full owners.
I read what you wrote Maurizio Lupi, Forza CL and Italy – the picture is complete! – Who, forced to give reason to his master that he had promised during the election campaign for the abolition of the ICI on the first home, writes: “So why cut the ICI? The reason is simple: the `ICI is a tax that hits the house, a good thing that most Italians bought at the cost of enormous sacrifices. And for this reason it is perceived as one of the most odious taxes. We believe freedom of the people instead of housing a right of every individual and this does not mean that serious about it any kind of taxation. You see, Mr Maurizio Lupi has no ideas at all clear and not know that there is the universal destination of earthly goods, does not know that private property is theft on them, does not know what is right to pay a tax on a land that is not mine and that the tax is not on the house but on that ground. More confusion than that!
That land is mine, run it, then my duty to pay a fee. ICI is therefore not a tax on the house itself but the land on which the house was built. The house certainly is mine, whether I bought or inherited: they are indeed the owner for all purposes of my house, but I can not say the same of the land on which stands the house. I am an owner of the house but not land. So it is right that I should pay a fee, not the house itself but on the ground. A tax that will go for the common good.
So, totally remove the ICI on the ground is a violation of the universal destination of earthly goods. It is clear that the fee will be assessed based on the amount of land which the owner of any land, even if it were not for construction. I am against the total abolition of the ICI also the first house, but supports its fairer assessment. If my beliefs are right, they become really unbearable and ridiculous reasons which usually lead in favor or against ICI ICI. Municipalities complain that without the revenue ICI their budgets should be in crisis (and therefore the reasons are affordability), while, on the other hand, some politicians talk about a tax “unfair.
What are your good ideas, when the reality is totally different and is determined by the same law? A municipality can not forbid a citizen to buy all the land he wants. ” It’s true. And we go on like this until you have the strength to change a law that it deems lawful private property ownership and unlimited use of the earth. “But it is a secular law.” It’s true. But the fact remains that it is wrong. Until yesterday was another common belief that the war was also right. Today is higher, choral, I would say the popular belief that war, every war is unjust to condemn, to banish from the face of the Earth. I am convinced that we will recognize what I’m saying that now on private property. But … why wait until tomorrow? Do not be too late? Should insist on sowing the truth because the truth is no certainty that today are the result of sowing, sometimes with blood, the prophets of the past.
No need to launch today an idea, and then let it evaporate quickly. We must ensure that the idea comes in culture, education and culture requires a constant, widespread, persistent.
Also reflect, perhaps not willing to admit that all the tragedies linked to the Earth depend on private property rights. The Earth is the date because management is honored, edited, saved from selfishness of man. It is property law that encourages selfishness.
I would be even more brutal. If you have two pieces of land, to steal another to his right to have her. So to me you’re a thief, even if you take my right. Of thieves in our small towns there are. Each country has its own. Are those who have too much more than it should, what should the limits of which are set by the rights of others. I insist. I know I am bored. But no matter. With deaf must use all possible systems to get to remove them from their preconceived deafness, also due to a millenarian belief unhealthy to believe just the absolute right to private property, a right established by law for most of the more liberal market. Liberal course for those who can make the most, on the principle of having the most frenetic. You could also speak of liberal principle, but when all are equated. How can you use the word “liberal” when in reality the money circulating with the money? You know what you mean the word “liberal”?
To be more clear and concrete. Think about a country. (Incidentally, the problem of the city is big, I wonder what sense a city or a set of blocks, each set against each other like sardines, without a green space, all concrete and asphalt? The citizen feels cut off from Earth: an uprooted). In our small towns, where land is the life we breathe every second, the environment around us with the scent of its lush vegetation and forests, it is easier to see the direct land-dweller, and is easier Note the contrast landowner and landowner. One wonders: why him yes, and not me? Because the rich can own estates, and I do not even have the opportunity to build a house? Why? Sure, why there remains suspended: I nearly doubt that private property is theft, so much so that, if I could, if I had the money, if I could enter the competition, do not hesitate to act like all the landowners . And this is where I say that there is no training, or rather an awareness of natural law that no one has the right to private property on Earth and that we can not have been more than that is determined by the right of all to have under management its a piece of land.
The right to property is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which in art. 17 says:
- Everyone has the right to own property alone or jointly with others.
- No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
In the two International Covenants of 1966, however, this right is reaffirmed in a legally binding. It is therefore not founded any attempt that tries to assert the right to own expense academic exercise of other rights. And ‘the opposite true: whenever there is a conflict between property rights and basic human rights are those which must prevail. The issue has arisen, for example, in the parliamentary debate on the law in Italy for expulsion from the family home of the violent spouse or partner: Centre-right MPs argued that it could not violate the right to property, and then prevailed correct view according to which a woman’s right to safeguard their safety should prevail over that of the spouse owning the property home.
For women, the question of property rights is still a relevant issue, in case it is often a ground of discrimination. It ‘is therefore useful to refer to all anti-discrimination rules, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, both for its general rules for the affirmation of Article 13, which states “States Parties undertake to take all appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination against women in other areas of economic and social life.”
The Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is still more explicit, with the commitment of States parties, contained in Article 5, to eliminate discrimination and safeguard the right to equality before the law, among other things.
The solid phase is composed of earthy particles and living organisms in the soil. The chemical nature of the particles is partly earthy mineral, partly organic, partly chemical. The earthy nature of the particles has direct influence on many physical and mechanical properties of the soil (see below).
The mineral particles are those derived from pedogenic process of disintegration of rocks. The chemical and mineralogical composition is a composite allochthonous soils, especially floods, while it is reduced to a few elements in the native land, originated from the parent rock underneath. In general it is the primary and secondary silicates, carbonates, phosphates, hydroxides and oxides. Other salts such as halides and sulphates, and minor components are present in significant quantities only in soils derived from special rocks. Earthy particles are largely inert and interact with the ecosystem land only in a very long time. Those smaller than 0.1 μ have colloidal properties and have therefore a role of dynamic interaction with other components.